Real Total v.1.4

Real Total v.1.4

Text of serie "Delirios" author: Guillermo H. Casa (first version:1998, last revision: 2005)

Discussing about three-dimensional tv or holography 3D is archaic, and everyone knew roughly what it is, is reality. ¿Changed the world?

Let's go deeper to see why the image in a rectangle? Aureus in the best case, why not a circle, a triangle, a hexagon?. 3D An area would be best? A pyramid, a tetrahedron, a prism-polyhedra could continue forever, however, without shape or form?.

Why not, a vision? virtual reality, well, that too is history. But still not reached the people. Think of all the senses, which we know and who know the taste, smell, hearing and balance, touch, aura, and feel as we move into the true reality?

Is the true reality?

What if we think of something deeper,

less commercial

more intangible,

I want the real total.

What?

Find the real total is a little more, go there!, What if we can be aware of all our possible perceptions, to be simultaneously in many places, to perceive not only our feelings but all around us, human and nonhuman, All!, including thought.

And if those other places weren´t in the same spatial dimension, and collects the past and the future.

Even if we could perceive the other as if we are to be found elsewhere, in another dimension or another time. Experience the past, the lives of those who lived (the life of heroes and the lives of the forgotten), or the other end ... What if we can make a prospective live as we think will be the future, live the life of someone who does not live yet, what if we can live the life to come will be how?.

We can live life not only of humans but of other beings, including aliens, or live lives that will never be lived in "reality", or our dimension. Living fantasies or inconsistencies, living realities constructed based on physics, chemistry and biology different, why not the opposite of "reality."

And our life?

Shall we live as we live it?

Will that day?

Will it be real or virtual will be?

If it depends on us all and each.

I hung up. Let the frenzy, the total would actually like to live everything.

We could bring everyone to life, who lived and those who could live.

Does it have anything to do with religion? I believe that religions are the highest and forbidden desires of each culture, and the amount of any kind.

What if when we all live (absolutely all) would receive all the sensations and thoughts more intimate, all could live the life of each and every one could live our lives. What is that?, Life itself, all life on unit, merging body and mind, at first all the time, no time in any space, or not.

Knowing, feeling, perceiving, thinking, questioning everything. All or nothing? That is perfection.

What is the ultimate goal? Having no end?

All or nothing, how do they differ. The whole is divisible, measurable, in short: finite space-time, which does not cease to be parts of it. Passes over us, from within we can not cover, and from outside? therefore, no nothing!. Nothing is indivisible, immeasurable, unlimited, eternal and infinite.

Where do I got?

To get where he wanted!

We could live the lives impossible, to perceive the events in real time and across space, or where there is no life, live all the events to be lived impossible, perfection, completeness, total reality.

What is perfection? but a fee, the ideal maximum, reason and without reason, in fact impossible, "but by no means irrelevant. Such as mathematics, can be made increasingly larger or smaller but never reach the last number. An infinite continuum where there are two paths to follow, the positive perfection, the negative: the destruction.

But after all this verbiage, is it possible? Do we want that possible? paradise. God exists?, The oldest and most dangerous question known by You.

I have my answer, which I serve.

Are we ready to know the truth? What truth? Yours, mine, of all ... Is it worth?

I think they're all the answers within you, and are all in each. Are you serve your way to understand everything.

And what was this?

I do not know, upsi, television, thought about all the things you missed the live?

Is it worth? Tire questions, answers, they're you, I said.

What followed on the subject ...

Traducción: Eduardo Ordas

Total reality

Total réalité

Total Realität

??????? ??????

S????? p?a?µat???t?ta

Totaal werkelijkheid

Totale realtà

Total realidade

????? ??????????

Bibliografía

Diseño, tecnología y participación, David Elliott / Nigel Cross. The Open University, Inglaterra. 1975. Versión en castellado GG, 1980. (siempre atrasados)

Jung y el principio de sincronicidad, arquetipos y simbolos, Abraham Haber. Enrique Santiago Rueda Editor, 1986.

El hombre mecánico, Hans Moravec. Biblioteca Cientìcia Salvat. 1988.

La nueva conciencia psicodélica, Terence McKenna. Planeta - Nueva Conciencia. 1991.

+ Un punto azul palido, Carl Sagan. Planeta. 1994.

Revistas Muy Interesante. Varias.

Referencias: El hombre del jardìn; La Tempestad; Robotech; Star Wars; El abismo...